Times b2b HomeTimes b2b Home
 
       
 
    Channels
Cover Story
 
August-September'03
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#


The Trojan barrel

Shuchi Srivastava tries to read between the lines while investigating the red carpet treatment being accorded to imported foreign liquor

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has recently notified that beverages, spirits and vinegar covered under the ITC (HS) classifications may be imported under the duty-free entitlement. It allows hotels (three star and above) a duty-free import-entitlement equivalent to 5 per cent of their average foreign exchange earnings over the preceding 3 years, subject to a minimum average foreign exchange revenue of Rs 1 million per year.  Market sources report that around 600 luxury hotels have the necessary foreign exchange earnings to qualify for the duty-free entitlement. After the duty-free sector (diplomats and foreign passport holders), luxury hotels and the tourism sector are the major importers and consumers of foreign liquor in India.

The duty-free entitlement offers a significant cost relief to the luxury hotels, as the existing import duties on alcoholic beverages vary from 150 per cent to 633 per cent. It is expected that the prevalent prohibitive prices of liquor at bars and restaurants in luxury hotels may come down by 33-50 per cent. They also expect that the current foreign brands to domestic brands usage ratio will shift in favour of foreign brands at most luxury hotels. Reports indicate that more than 200 eligible hotels have already applied for the duty-free entitlement for imports.

Other licensed restaurant and pub owners are up in arms against this DGFT notification, claiming discrimination, as they will not be eligible for import duty rebate. If the hotels pass on their cost advantage to their clients, these consumers are expected to shift en masse to hotel bars, and the independent restaurants and bars will likely face problems.

The Government on the other hand will have a hard time extending the duty rebate to the independent restaurants and bars, however, as that would represent a significant revenue loss for them. Restaurants and bars currently earn around Rs 10-12 billion per year. Besides the likely revenue loss incurred by granting a level playing field to the restaurant sector vis-à-vis the hotel sector, the Government will also be concerned about the resentment from the domestic liquor industry against any such step, as this would further shift liquor consumption towards imported brands. How fair is this ruling, given the nature of the taxation structure that governs our own indigenous liquor industry?

In our attempt to successfully answer this crucial query, we speak to LM Batra, Secretary General of the All India Distillers Association (AIDA), and Vijay K Rekhi, President, Spirits Division, McDowell Herbertsons.

Excerpts from the interview with Mr Batra

What do you feel about this move?

I admit that we have to encourage a strong global commercial interest in our country and we stand to gain a lot from healthy level playing competitive field.  Nevertheless we have strongly recommended to the Government that under no circumstances should cheap imported liquor be allowed in the country at any cost.

This exactly is one of the greatest fears expressed by all concerned, that cheap imported liquor will flood both the white and the grey markets?

The grey market per se is primarily a law and order problem, and we, as an industry, look to the Government and the excise machinery to provide our businesses with adequate protection.  I seriously doubt whether the concerned authorities are interested in taking the required steps to enforce what is mandated under law, thanks to the corrosive corruption that plagues the entire system.

There is also talk that the Government is soon going to lift the 27-year-old ban imposed on Indian breweries regarding capacity expansion?

We are very hopeful that it will be done. The matter is currently pending in front of the constitutional bench of the Supreme Court. I strongly believe that it should have been removed long back. This removal is especially welcome now, when the Government is throwing open its doors to international competition and a majority of our indigenous breweries and distilleries are still shackled with limited capacities.

What is the total percentage of duties levied on domestic and foreign liquor?

Domestic liquor manufacturers are currently shelling out close to 400 per cent as duties while the foreign liquor companies are required to provide little less than 250 per cent. But we have to contend with a lot of dismay in the international community as they find this duty structure extremely unfair and deem it ‘as denial of market existence’ notwithstanding the fact that our own industry is taxed almost doubly.

Would you say that the liquor segment has been the favourite flogging horse of the Government?

The treatment accorded to domestic manufacturers has been unfair. A claim proven by the fact that the central excise duty levied on molasses, the basic feedstock for liquor produced in India, is Rs 500 per tonne, which is in complete disregard of the fact that Article 82 of the Constitution forbids the Government from reaping any direct benefits from alcoholic drinks meant for human consumption. Our liquor then ceases to be internationally competitive as raw feedstock in most countries is heavily subsidised. 

Given that the Government is moving toward reducing the basic import tariffs to 150 per cent by 2005, is it clear then that the Indian liquor industry should gear up to defend its turf?

We shall move the courts if any such move is made as it would be criminally unfair given that our indigenously produced alcohol is not allowed to be sold in these very countries which are pushing for these reductions in these so called ‘trade barriers’.

I had the courage to tell the Government that in this matter we should clearly adopt a quid pro quo policy.

But in the last budget the basic custom duty was reduced from 182 per cent to 166 per cent?

This occurred due to the obligations that we have to the WTO, in accordance with our agreement where the bound rate of duty levied on processed food has to be 150 per cent by 2004. 

.....CONTD

TO READ FURTHER... SUBSCRIBE TO YOUR COPY TODAY!!!

 

Other B2B magazines
The Machinist
The Machinist
Times Shipping Journal
Times Shipping Journal
Times Journal Construction and  Design
Times Journal of Construction & Design
Instrumentatio & Control
Instrumentation & Control Journal
Fluid Power
Fluid Power
Times Food Processing Journal
Times Food Processing Journal
ET Polymers
ET Polymers
Times Agriculture Journal
Times Agriculture Journal
Retail Biz Retail Biz
Copyright © Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd. • All rights reserved • Disclaimer
Other Times Group Sites - The Times Of India | The Economic Times | ET Invest | ETintelligence | Femina | Filmfare | Navbharat Times | Times Classifieds | Property Times | Education Times | Maharashtra Times | Responservice | Indianadsabroad | Jobs & Careers | Times Multimedia